I don't personally use it frequently - my his-laptop currently runs Server 2008 64-bit Enterprise (thanks Microsoft Trial Software and the Windows Server 2008 to Workstation Manual), my desktop runs XP and Ubuntu, my work computer is a combination of XP and whatever I can boot off a USB stick. The hers-laptop is Vista Ultimate, but my wife is the main user of that machine.
Needless to say, Microsoft isn't happy that Vista adoption rates are low. But instead of poking the media in the chest with their 800-lb finger, they took a more crafty route.
Enter Microsoft Windows "Mojave," a new and improved OS for the Vista-hater.
Or is it?
Basically Microsoft lured the haters to a focus group to test a new experimental OS. They allowed the participants to opine on Vista's faults - despite having never tried (or seen) it - before allowing them to feast on the next-gen os on some slick hardware.
In a classic Candid Camera moment, they filmed the reactions of the haters when the marketeer announced "Mojave is really Windows Vista." Go see the videos: http://www.mojaveexperiment.com
In any case, it's an interesting example of a social experiment to uncover a media-induced bias. Why did the anti-Vistites dislike the OS so? They had never used it. It could be argued that one must experiment with something to truly understand its characteristics before making an opinion. However, some things need no experimentation.